| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jan | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
- January 6, 2010: Time, Times, and Half A Time
- December 18, 2009: Heads Up! A Meditation on Blunt-Force Trauma
- December 11, 2009: I Wonder as I Wander - a Blog for the Feast of Christmas
- December 4, 2009: Shakespeare at Advent
- November 23, 2009: Advent Blog
- October 12, 2009: How Can I Know What I Believe Until I See What I Do?
- October 9, 2009: Cyrano de Balderac
- September 26, 2009: Treasure Hunt
- August 29, 2009: Undone by Technicalities?
- August 22, 2009: End of Summer: A Brief Backward Glance
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
Maundy Thursday and Triduum
An elephant may never forget, but rats do - especially if scientists have been messing with them.
Researchers at Downstate Medical Center in Brooklyn, New York, have cooked up a drug that chokes off the brain’s production of a substance needed to recall certain kinds of information. Specifically, the agent rejects memories of emotional associations. So far they’ve only tried it on rats but, depressingly enough, our brains don’t seem that different from a rodent’s. (How they figure out a rat’s emotions is a question my source doesn’t address.) The neuroscientists behind these experiments hope to use their discovery to treat dementia, addiction, improve memory and help people overcome trauma.
One possible application quickly occurs to theological types like me: forgiveness. Imagine a tablet that erases my recall of a wrong suffered. Grace in a capsule; take two pills and don’t call God in the morning. “Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me and I forgive him? Up to seven times?” “I do not say to you, up to seven times, but for as long as your medication holds out.”
But that’s just the problem: forgiveness, rightly understood, is not forgetting, but remembering and chosing to love. C. S. Lewis actually speculated “that salvation consists not in the cancelling of these eternal moments but in the perfefcted humility that bears the shame forever, rejoicing in the occasion which it furnished to God’s compassion and glad that it should be common knowledge to the universe.” Elsewhere Lewis argues that “real forgiveness means looking steadily at the sin, the sin that is left over without any excuse, after all allowances have been made, and seeing it in all its horror, dirt, meanness, and malice, and nevertheless being wholly reconciled to the man who has done it. That, and only that, is forgiveness.”
I’m thinking about this as Lent limps toward its lean conclusion and we sink with a whisper into the Triduum - the Latin name for the three days that lead up to Easter Sunday. The first of these is Maundy Thursday, a day named after a commandment, specifically, a commandment that we remember something.
Maundy is also Latin meaning “command.” It gives us a batch of words that Americans don’t like very much at all, words like demand and mandate. The title derives from John 13.34, “A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another.” That’s the directive, soothingly abstract, but Jesus welded it to a couple of distressingly concrete actions: footwashing and the Lord’s Supper. John records the former while the Synoptics detail the latter. Both occurred on the night before Jesus went to the cross, so that night, Thursday night, becomes Maundy Thursday, the day of commandment. And the latter of the commands I mentioned - the Lord’s Supper - Jesus presents specifically as an act of remembering: “Do this in remembrance of me.”
Do what? Remember what? A body riven by my rebellion, blood that gushes from the wounds my sin inflicts. Not medicine ingested to help me forget, but food digested to make me remember.
Many times in Evangelical practice we keep only half of Jesus’ commandment. That is to say, we remember - but we choose the memory. Triduum receives short shrift in Baptist life. We reject as Catholic anything with a Latin name. We like to say we’re avoiding legalism but I think what we’re really doing is swallowing the forgetful pill. We like Easter Sunday and empty tombs and unoccupied crosses because they reassure us that the worst is over. Yes, Jesus had to die on the cross but he’s done with that now so we don’t have to think about sending him there or, worse yet, joining him there. “We recoil,” writes Richard Neuhaus, “The derelict cries, ‘Come, follow me.’ Follow him there? We close our ears. We hurry on to Easter. But we will not know what to do with Easter’s light if we shun the friendship of the darkness that is wisdom’s way to light.” If we’re not careful, Easter Sunday winds up meaning, not that Jesus overcame Calvary, but that it’s as if Calvary never really happened, or at least has been undone. And there’s all the difference in the world between a thing overcome and a thing undone.
So I think the Triduum is a good idea. Again, Neuhaus urges, “Do not rush to conquest. Stay a while with this day. Let your heart be broken by the unspeakably bad of this Friday we call good. . . .Stay a while in the eclipse of light, stay a while with the conquered One. There is time enough for Easter.”
So go to church and take the prescription that keeps alive the memory of your sin. Then wait a few days. Then go to church and take the prescription that also keeps alive the memory of your salvation. Three days in the darkness will teach us to love the light.